Ending violence against children should be a top priority for President Ramaphosa’s new Cabinet
RONDEBOSCH, CAPE TOWN, 3 June 2019—Yesterday marked the start of child protection week. Over the next few days NGOs, researchers and citizens will be called on to end violence against children. It is just as important that there is a commitment from the highest level of government to protect South Africa’s children.
President Cyril Ramaphosa recognised gender-based violence as “a crisis that is tearing our society apart” during the Presidential Summit on Gender-Based Violence and Femicide in November 2018. However, a government review of the effectiveness of programmes and institutions to address violence against women and children has revealed systemic failings and a lack of political will to stop the growing tide of violence. South Africa’s new Cabinet must make ending all violence against children a top priority. While poverty and inequality are high on the government’s agenda, it’s important to note that violence carries an equally high social and economic cost for families, the state and business and needs to be given equal priority.
Widespread violence against women and children drives an inter-generational cycle
Violence against women and children is widespread. Several South African studies point to the saturation of violence in the everyday lives of children. The Birth to Twenty Plus study found that 99% of children had experienced or witnessed some form of violence, and more than 40% had multiple experiences of violence in their homes, schools and communities.
All forms of violence affect children of both genders. Evidence shows that larger numbers of boys experience sexual abuse than previously believed. Both boys and girls similarly experience physical abuse, but emotional violence is poorly understood. At the same time, almost half of South African women experience intimate partner violence during their lifetime and nearly 40% of women reported physical abuse during pregnancy in a study from KwaZulu-Natal.
“Violence against women and children are inextricably linked,” says Prof Shanaaz Mathews, Director of the Children’s Institute, UCT. “They occur in the same households and share the same drivers. Shared risk factors include family conflict; poverty; alcohol and substance abuse; patriarchy within the family and in society at large; and social norms that tolerate violence towards women and children.”
The interaction of social and personal factors contributes to a never-ending cycle of violence and abuse where victims are at increased risk of revictimisation, or even becoming perpetrators themselves. For example, women who experience violence at the hands of their intimate partner are more likely to use corporal punishment, as are women who experienced trauma in their own childhood. Men who experienced violence in childhood are more likely to kill or be violent towards intimate partners than men who did not. So, to stop femicide and GBV we first must stop violence against children. Support for parents can, however, break this cycle and increase protection for children.
Impact of violence on individuals, and the cost to the economy
Violence is associated with short- and long-term effects on children’s health and development. Starting during pregnancy, the latest research suggests that intimate partner violence has a negative impact on the unborn child increasing the risk of neurodevelopmental disorders, lower intellectual functioning and poor parent-child bonding.
Children who are abused learn to tolerate violence and are at increased risk of poor mental health (e.g., anxiety and depression), drug and alcohol abuse, risky sexual behaviours and HIV, externalising behaviour problems (e.g., aggression, delinquency) and poor social functioning. In the Birth to Twenty Plus study, violent behaviour was reported by more than 65% of primary school children, rising to 89% of adolescents.
A recent study investigated the social burden and economic impact of violence against children in South Africa. Researchers found that preventing children from experiencing and witnessing violence reduces multiple social problems. For example self-harm could be reduced by 23% in the population if children did not experience physical violence. Other population wide benefits include reducing HIV infection, substance (drug and alcohol) abuse, and interpersonal violence.
The study also shows that violence has a substantial impact on the economy. Children who experience violence earn less later in life than children who do not. This lower earning potential combined with time lost to illness and additional burden on health and welfare services, meant that the long-term cost of violence against children in 2015/16 stood at R238 billion or nearly 5% of the country’s gross domestic product. GBV also carries a high price for families, the state and business, so unless we make ending violence a priority, we will not be able to reduce inequality and poverty.
Time for a more radical approach
For the last three years child protection week has recognised that violence against children is such an enormous challenge that it needs all of us to change our behaviour. But, when it comes to ending violence, we clearly need a new approach.
We have to stop hitting children. The research evidence is clear. Corporal punishment is harmful to children, it teaches them violence and often leads to more severe forms of abuse.
“It’s not just severe abuse and beating that lead to negative consequences,” explains Dr Chandre Gould from the Institute of Security Studies. “All forms of violence, including smacking or spanking can make children depressed, angry and anxious.”
When parents and teachers stop hitting children, research has shown that violence against women reduces. These things are all linked. To achieve this, our leaders must speak out against the use of violence, especially in the home and in schools.
South Africa needs to support families who care for children under difficult circumstances. We need to prevent violence by making sure children have somewhere safe to go after school, and that good quality child care facilities are available to all parents. We need gender equality and economic policies that reduce poverty and financial inequality.
“Parenting programs that give parents the tools they need to discipline their children without hitting or spanking them and encourage men to share the burden of care do make a positive difference,” says Gould.
For Further Information:
- Shanaaz Mathews: firstname.lastname@example.org
(Expertise: fatal child abuse; Birth to Twenty Plus study)
- Lucy Jamieson: email@example.com
(Expertise: child protection system)
- Diketso Mufamadi
(Expertise: parenting programmes, corporal punishment, speaks isiZulu, isiXhosa and Venda)
- Margot Cornelius: firstname.lastname@example.org
(General media inquiries)
- Richter L et al (2018) A longitudinal perspective on violence in the lives of South African children from the Birth to Twenty Plus cohort study in Johannesburg-Soweto, South African Medical Journal 108(3):181-186.
- Mathews S et al (2016) Towards a more comprehensive understanding of the direct and indirect determinants of violence against women and children. Cape Town: Safety and Violence Initiative, University of Cape Town.
- Hsiao C, Fry D, Ward CL, Ganz G, Casey T, Zheng X & Fang X (2018) Violence against children in South Africa: the cost of inaction to society and the economy. BMJ Global Health, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-8.
- Murray AL, Kaiser D, Valdebenito S, Hughes C, Baban A, Fernando AD, . . . Eisner M (2018) The intergenerational effects of intimate partner violence in pregnancy: mediating pathways and implications for prevention. Trauma Violence & Abuse, p. 1524838018813563.
- Röhrs S (2018) Reducing physical punishment of children: Using schools as nodes of intervention (Policy Brief). Cape Town and Pretoria: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town and Gender & Health Research Unit, South African Medical Research Council.